The Great Awakening, The Enlightenment, and James Madison
Two great movements of the 18th century sought to give
men freedom. Each promised to free the
minds of men and in turn give them liberty from oppression. In some instances, one movement would hold
primacy over the other or completely exclude the other. When balance was not maintained, the rights
of individuals and groups were suppressed.
Extreme measures were taken against those that stood against the
dominant position. In one point of time,
both the Enlightenment and the Reformation combined to create a new world of
freedom for men.
Born out of the Renaissance, the Enlightenment placed
value upon logic and reason. While early
thinkers such as Pascal saw reason as a portion of General Revelation, later
generations began to move away from the faith alone perspectives of the Medieval
Roman Catholic Church. Religion,
commonly referred to as superstition by Enlightenment thinkers such as Voltaire
and Jefferson, was replaced with a view of existence which was discerned or
determined by reason. Views of what humans
are, how they should live together in society, and how they should be governed
were written down for debate.
From the Reformation came the first great revival
movement of the North American continent, the Great Awakening. This religious upswell in the American
Colonies, due to the teachings of ministers like George Whitefield, sparked
further debate among the colonists concerning the nature of man’s relationship
to God. Moving the basis of redemption
from birthright to right of conscience, the Great Awakening would reinvigorate
the discussion concerning freedom of religion in the colonies. While many of the northern colonies were
founded by groups fleeing religious persecution in England, some, such as
Massachusetts and Connecticut, maintained their respective denomination as the
only legally practiced denomination. Authorities
levied criminal penalties for those who practiced dissenting denominations. The Crown Colonies, Virgina and the
Carolinas, similarly supported the official denomination of the Empire,
Anglicanism, with similar penalties for preaching from other sects. The Great Awakening returned to the Scripture
to show that each person, regardless of their social consequence or physical
heritage, was responsible for their own spiritual journey. Freedom was meant to be expressed in all
aspects of life.
Thought and debate refine concepts, yet true benefit is
carried out through application. From
the writings of John Locke, David Hume, and Rousseau, the Enlightenment
concepts of government were passed to the minds of the men who framed the
Constitution. These men who built the
Constitution had stood against a king, started a revolution that had first
begun in the hearts and later the minds of Americans fueled by the Great
Awakening. When the war ended and
self-rule was obtained, this group met to determine the framework for this new
government.
James Madison presented the base framework upon which the
remaining Constitution would be built. Madison
envisioned a Lockean republic for the new nation. No republic had been successfully utilized
for a nation as large as the United States.
The Enlightenment argued that factions would create despots or chaos. Yet, Madison discovered and communicated a
reason for the large republic to survive.
While the overall design came from the Enlightenment, the key to stability
came from the Great Awakening. The
freedom to exercise the rights of conscience would promote the formation of
factions, which in turn would prevent the creation of tyranny or the decline
into anarchy. From his college mentor, John
Witherspoon, Madison had learned not only about the Great Awakening but also
about the Scottish Enlightenment. Madison
would draw on both as the basis of his defense of the Constitution in The
Federalist.
The premise of this investigation is that the Constitution of the United States, when viewed as the intersection of the Great Awakening and the Enlightenment, is an apologetic from history. The success of the United States Constitution has not been replicated. The Enlightenment alone was the basis of the French Revolution. The Reformation alone was the basis of the governments in the Swiss Confederation, the German States, and Great Britain. Both polarized conditions resulted in violence and turmoil for groups and individuals who held differing opinions, religions, or thoughts from the government. However, together they resulted in a new
Madison’s observations of how the Baptists in Virginia
were treated had prompted him to consider religious tolerance prior to
attending college. To what extent this
was further cultivated by Witherspoon’s teaching will be explored. One key flaw in the Constitution for many,
including John Leland and Thomas Jefferson, was the failure to protect
individual rights. Madison felt that the
document did not need it, what was the basis of his stance?
Following the successful ratification of the Constitution,
Madison was almost maneuvered out of a role in the new government by Patrick
Henry. Historians contribute Henry’s
actions to his Anti-Federalist views but also in part to Madison’s defeat of Henry’s
religious taxation initiative.
Correspondence will be reviewed to corroborate the direness of the
situation that Madison faced. Facing
mounting odds in the election, Madison allegedly met with the Baptist leaders
within his constituents where an exchange of support for the promise of a bill
of rights was formulated. Evidence
supports the Baptist vote swaying the election in Madison’s favor. Madison did propose the amendments as the
first order of business for the First Congress, but how much of the legend can
be supported?
Finally, the basis for religious violence against
individuals within European countries with established religions is
documented. However, the tie between the
violence of French Revolution and the lack of moral absolutes from Christianity
needs to be further explored. The
difference between the Scottish/English Enlightenment and the French
Enlightenment was demonstrated in William Burke’s Reflections on the French
Revolution. The cause of this
difference must be explored further to determine the how impactful it was on
the American situation.
Comments
Post a Comment